Vue Toast Library Comparison
One page, all major comparisons.
Decision Matrix
Green = stronger fit Red = weaker fit Gray = depends on use-case
Quick decision: if you need advanced queue control, promise workflows, and deep theming, start with Toastflow.
| Criteria | Toastflow | vue3-notification | vue-sonner | vue-toast-notification | notivue | vue3-toastify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup speed | Very fast plugin + container setup with strong defaults | Very fast plugin + <notifications /> path | Very fast Toaster + toast() path | Very fast plugin setup | Fast setup, but model is broader | Very fast ToastContainer + toast() path |
| Advanced queue controls | Explicit queue + maxVisible + queue pause/resume | No documented advanced queue orchestration | No documented advanced queue orchestration | No documented advanced queue orchestration | limit + enqueue controls | No documented advanced queue orchestration |
| Promise API | Built-in loading -> success/error workflow | No documented first-class promise helper | toast.promise + loading pattern | No documented first-class promise helper | Dedicated Promise API | toast.promise API |
| Custom rendering | Default renderer + headless slot path | Custom component/group patterns, plugin-oriented | Headless/custom content patterns | Custom components, mainly plugin/component path | Custom notifications + composable-driven model | Custom content/components, container-oriented |
| Styling and theming | CSS vars + animation class control | Class-based styling hooks | Custom class/style + icon/theming controls | Theme presets + class-level styling | Theme system + custom component styling path | Theme + transition + style/class controls |
| Type safety and state control | Typed Vue facade + typed core store orchestration | TypeScript support, simpler state model | Typed API, focused on toast calls | Typed usage path, plugin-centric state model | Typed composable model with explicit controls | Typed API with container-centric orchestration |
| API simplicity | Simple start, broader surface for scale | Low decision surface | Low decision surface | Low decision surface | Medium decision surface | Medium decision surface (many options available) |
Competitor Notes
Toastflow vs vue3-notification
- Choose
Toastflowwhen queue behavior and headless rendering are core requirements. - Choose
vue3-notificationwhen you want lean, notification-first plugin ergonomics.
Toastflow vs vue-sonner
- Choose
Toastflowwhen toasts are part of app workflow state and need stronger orchestration. - Choose
vue-sonnerwhen a constrained Sonner-style API is the best fit for your team.
Toastflow vs vue-toast-notification
- Choose
Toastflowwhen you need customization depth and long-term runtime control. - Choose
vue-toast-notificationwhen speed of plugin integration is the primary goal.
Toastflow vs notivue
- Choose
Toastflowwhen explicit queue and lifecycle controls are required. - Choose
notivuewhen its composable/component conventions match your architecture.
Toastflow vs vue3-toastify
- Choose
Toastflowfor workflow-level control and headless flexibility. - Choose
vue3-toastifyfor toastify-style familiarity and constrained setup.
Recommendation
If your priority is a constrained API with minimal decisions, pick an opinionated option.
If your priority is runtime control + customization depth with strong defaults, pick Toastflow.